I didn't know that you had decided to move text into the new -ps document and
to abandon the document that I co-authored with you.
Hannes
Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Hi Hannes,
>
>We were advised by the ABFAB Chairs that we needed to get consensus on
>a problem statement before we could work on the solution documents in
>ABFAB. The -ps document were an attempt to document a problem
>statement for that purpose.
>
>I think that all of the still-pertinent information in the multihop-fed
>document has been moved to the Trust Router protocol document, and
>multihop-fed has been abandoned. Let me know if I've missed anything
>you would like to see preserved.
>
>Margaret
>
>
>On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Btw, I never understood why Josh, Rhys, and Margaret suddenly started
>a new document.
>> I like draft-mrw-abfab-multihop-fed-02 more.
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]>
>writes:
>>>
>>> Hannes> Here is also a good document related to this topic:
>>> Hannes> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrw-abfab-multihop-fed-02
>>>
>>>
>>> The multihop federation document is somewhat out of date.
>>> we believe that the introductory text from that document has been
>>> migrated to the new protocol document.
>>>
>>> --Sam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> abfab mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
