I support. Minor comment. This is really a question of process. I think the first sentence in section 3 might need to be removed or modified if we are no longer updating RFC 3748.
Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Klaas Wierenga > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 1:30 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [abfab] WGLC for draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-02 > > Hi, > > This e-mail starts a 2 week (ending April 23d) Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-02 (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf- > abfab-eapapplicability/). Version 02 reflects the consensus in the WG meeting > in Orlando, but please explicitly state whether you are in favour of this > version or not even if you have already done so in the meeting. > > Thanks, > > Klaas and Leif > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
