Re: [abfab] WGLC for draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-02

Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:04:55 -0700 

On 04/10/2013 03:31 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> OK. My preferred solution to your comment is to add updates to the
> headers and abstract.
> I think the intro is fairly clear on the point.
>
Agree. This looks like something we can handle just before/at IETF LC.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to