>>>>> <[email protected]> writes: > If my understanding is correct we agreed that only section 3 of > draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability updates the EAP applicability > statement in [RFC3748]. Regards, Yoshihiro Ohba
i don't recall a discussion of that point, although it seems reasonably obvious. Only section 3 claims to be an EAp applicability statement. We did discuss the use of 2119 language at various points, but those changes have been made. The question here is whether an updates header should be added. _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
