At 11:38 AM 2/10/00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Bryan Prusha wrote:
> > I agree. I complained earlier about installers throwing
> > files/extensions/DLLs throughout your system, but I did leave room for
> > application layouts.
>
>I've been following this thread, but I'm confused as to what an application
>"layout" is. Is a "layout" just a directory with a defined structure of
>sub-files and sub-directories, that the application can count on for
>application data (templates, documents, images, etc.)?
Since there isn't a real concept of "application layout" (ie. it's
nothing imposed by the OS), I would have to surmise from Bryan's comments
that yes - the "layout" is just the directory hierarchy for the application.
Leonard
- factors to consider for the Mac port Paul Rohr
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac port DeRobertis
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac port Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac port Hubert Figuiere
- Mac port build (was: Re: factors to con... Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Mac port build Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Mac port build Bryan Prusha
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac por... DeRobertis
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac port Bryan Prusha
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac por... sterwill
- Re: factors to consider for the Ma... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: factors to consider for the Ma... Bryan Prusha
- RE: Fields -- are we ready to ... Henrik Berg
- RE: Fields -- are we ready... Paul Rohr
- commit - Updated Insert Field ... Henrik Berg
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac port Larry Kollar
- Re: factors to consider for the Mac port Bryan Prusha
