At 9:47 AM +1100 1/5/01, Martin Sevior wrote:
>Ah this finally makes sense. Have you actually lookd through the Pango
>API?
Yes, and I've read though parts of the code. That's how I
know what is and isn't possible with what is there today...
>I mean to but find myself dissecting RTF instead.
I'm sorry for you ;).
>BTW reading the RTF spec gives an excellent insight as to how MS Word
>works.
Or at least the original versions of Word.
LDR
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You've got a SmartFriend� in Pennsylvania
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
America Online: MACgician
Web Site: <http://www.lazerware.com/>
FTP Site: <ftp://ftp.lazerware.com/>
PGP Fingerprint: C76E 0497 C459 182D 0C6B AB6B CA10 B4DF 8067 5E65
- Re: proposal for gtk port: renaming fonts shipped with A... Dom Lachowicz
- Pango will be a problem (was Re: proposal for gtk p... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Pango will be a problem (was Re: proposal f... Vlad Harchev
- On rendering (Re: Pango will be a problem) Tomas Frydrych
- Re: On rendering (Re: Pango will be a p... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: On rendering (Re: Pango will b... Martin Sevior
- Interfaces [was: On rendering ... Leonard Rosenthol
- Interfaces [was: On rendering (Re:... Mike Nordell
- Re: Interfaces [was: On render... Leonard Rosenthol
- On rendering and reworking the AW ... Tomas Frydrych
- Re: On rendering and reworking... Mike Nordell
- rendering - how bad is AW ... Tomas Frydrych
- Re: rendering - how bad is... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: rendering Tomas Frydrych
- Re: rendering - how bad is... Mike Nordell
- Re: rendering - how bad is... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: rendering - how bad is... WJCarpenter
