Paul Rohr wrote: > The minimum expectation anyone should have > when they download a copy of the expat sources is that it has all of expat > in it. Unfortunately I have to agree with Pauls here. It's not that I don't like agreeing with him, it's that it adds more to d/l. But in this light, I think it's better to keep the whole package or completely drop it (I can only imagine if I got zlib from abi and all of sudden realized it wasn't realy zlib, just about 70% of the package). It sucks, but I agree. Either we keep it or we don't. I'd say, prefer "don't" _if_ we have a viable alternative. /Mike
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed... Mike Nordell
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed unused direc... Thomas Briggs
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed unused ... Sam TH
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed unu... Thomas Briggs
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed... Sam TH
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- rem... Thomas Briggs
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -... Sam TH
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: comm... Sam TH
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: comm... Thomas Briggs
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: comm... Sam TH
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed unused direc... Mike Nordell
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed unused direc... Dom Lachowicz
- Re: minimizing forks (was Re: commit -- removed unused direc... Dom Lachowicz
