> we have support for libxml-2, and libglade needs libxml-1 (but, yes, it when > glade upgrades to libxml-2 it may be a good argument to change the default > in the unix build from expat to libxml). Does anybody else think that this has "really bad idea" written all over it? libxml-1 for glade, optionally libxml-2 for AbiWord, optional shared expat for AbiWord or static expat in AbiWord? On every Unix platform? Maybe I've been in WindowsLand for too long, but this just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen to me. Just my $0.02 -Tom
- Re: commit -- libglade support Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Thomas Briggs
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Gediminas Paulauskas
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Gediminas Paulauskas
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Thomas Briggs
- Re: commit -- libglade support Thomas Fletcher
- Re: commit -- libglade support Paul Rohr
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- apache-style vetoes Paul Rohr
- Re: apache-style vetoes Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Aaron Lehmann
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
