On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:11:39PM +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote: > yes. I prefer to see the libglade issues solved, but if there are not > solved I (or Martin) will degladeify the dialog. I have a compromise. The GNOME build can use libglade. The GTK builds can use glade's code generation feature to avoid the prohibutive dependencies. I despise the code that glade outputs, but I'm willing to offer this comprise. And it's the most I'll budge on this point.
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Thomas Briggs
- Re: commit -- libglade support Thomas Fletcher
- Re: commit -- libglade support Paul Rohr
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- apache-style vetoes Paul Rohr
- Re: apache-style vetoes Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Aaron Lehmann
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- RE: commit -- libglade supp... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
