Re: So, when do we get autoconf support on Linux?

[Jesper Skov]

>>>>> "Sam" == Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sam> Sadly, however, that doesn't mean dependencies.  All the -Wp fun
Sam> stuff is gcc-specific, and a definite no-no.  I just took it out
Sam> of psiconv earlier today.

Of course we can have dependencies where supported. Simply add a
autoconf rule that checks for -Wp support in compiler and add it to
CFLAGS if it does. No sweat.

Jesper