According to Dom Lachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Should I just add '|| !UT_stricmp (szSuffix, ".dot")' to the recognizeSuffix > method, or should I add another filter to the list, kind of like what Vlad > did with "RTF for Old Apps"? The .dot extension is encountered *very* > infrequently, so I'm leaning toward the former method rather than the > latter. I vote for solution #1 Hub
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Dom Lachowicz
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Paul Rohr
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? WJCarpenter
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Martin Sevior
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Alan Horkan
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Paul Rohr
- localized content (was Re: [Bug] MS W... Paul Rohr
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Karl Ove Hufthammer
- Re: [Bug] MS Word Import .dot==.doc? Dom Lachowicz
- template design notes (was Re: [Bug] MS Word ... Paul Rohr
- Re: template design notes Paul Rohr
