On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:48:31PM +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote: > On 19 Mar 2001 14:04:57 +0400, Vlad Harchev wrote: > > Then the following could be used to multiply 'x' by 1.5: > > (x + x<<1) >> 1 > > I will be very fast. > uhm, it's not so readable as x = x * 1.5. In addition, if later we > decide to change from 1.5 to something else, it becomes harder. And in Can we have a sort of middle point here? x = x * y should be replaced by x *= y Hugs, rms
- suggestion: slight optimization for UT_String Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
- Re: suggestion: slight optimization for UT_Strin... Mike Nordell
- Re: suggestion: slight optimization for UT_S... Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
- Re: suggestion: slight optimization for ... Vlad Harchev
- Re: suggestion: slight optimization ... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: suggestion: slight optimiza... rms
- Re: suggestion: slight opti... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: suggestion: slight opti... Randy Kramer
- Re: suggestion: slight ... rms
- Code generation [was: s... Mike Nordell
- Re: Code generation [wa... Randy Kramer
- Re: suggestion: slight optimiza... Vlad Harchev
- Re: suggestion: slight opti... Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
- Re: suggestion: slight optimization for ... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: suggestion: slight optimization for UT_Strin... Dom Lachowicz
