On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Patrick Lam wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Thomas Fletcher wrote: > > > We are waiting for someone to take a compelling first stab at > > making these plugins a reality. Things that need to be considered > > It's unclear to me that plugins are a good idea to try to get in for 1.0. > I don't think that anyone is arguing for plugins before that. What I'm saying is that we haven't done any work on it because there are more important things to get done. If someone has a strong desire to go for it, there is a small amount of infrastructure in place for future growth. Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas (toe-mah) Fletcher QNX Software Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neutrino Development Group (613)-591-0931 http://www.qnx.com/~thomasf
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Sam TH
- what do we want into 1.0? (was ... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? rms
- Re: Linking against libjpeg... Patrick Lam
- Re: Linking against libjpeg... Robert G. Werner
- Re: Linking against libjpeg... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Linking against libjpeg... Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg... rms
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Aaron Lehmann
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Paul Rohr
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Paolo Molaro
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Paul Rohr
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Dom Lachowicz
