On mercredi, avril 18, 2001, at 07:11 , Sam TH wrote: > And, I would suggest making that a criteria for any new feature - If > you haven't started now, it won't go in 1.0. Period. > > How does that sound? Just qualify what a new feature is. Other than that, I agree. But in the case of the plug-in feature, I agree. Postponed after 1.0 Hub
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Paolo Molaro
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Thomas Fletcher
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Aaron Lehmann
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Patrick Lam
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Sam TH
- what do we want into 1.0? (was Re: L... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? rms
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Patrick Lam
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Robert G. Werner
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? rms
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Aaron Lehmann
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Paul Rohr
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Paolo Molaro
