On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Dom Lachowicz wrote: > > > 3) Just not support GIF, JPEG, TIFF, XPM, XBM, etc... This is > > > absolutely horrible. > > > >The alternative isn't a lot better -- it adds significant > >complexity (though not on the surface) to the file format, > >and raises the bar for new ports/platforms. > > I fail to see why. One the surface, we would see: > > <d mimetype="image/png"> -> <d mimetype="image/tiff"> > > Which doesn't look all too complex to me. Abiword's file format already includes the PNG spec by reference. Thankfully, Abiword includes PNG support by reference implementation :-) so nobody has to worry too much about that. Including the tiff spec, too, would be pretty horrible. Matthew.
- Re: Graphic Images Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Hubert Figuiere
- is it the same RGBA, though? (was Re: Graphi... Paul Rohr
- Re: is it the same RGBA, though? (was Re... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: is it the same RGBA, though? Paul Rohr
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Paul Rohr
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Paul Rohr
- Re: Graphic Images Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Sam TH
- Re: Graphic Images James Montgomerie
- Re: Graphic Images WJCarpenter
- Re: Graphic Images Sam TH
