According to Paul Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 5. Use gdk-pixbuf instead. > > I'm not clear on what *you* mean by #5. Some folks seem to believe that > something like gdk-pixbuf could be ported to become a lighter-weight > solution than miniIM for all our platforms. If I read Dom correctly, he's > been proposing to only use gdk-pixbuf on GTK/GNOME. > Dom is advocating the use of gdk-pixbuf as a native loader and renderer for GNOME build. By providing the needed infrastructures in the XP framework, this is doable. Hub
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Paul Rohr
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Paolo Molaro
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Paul Rohr
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Hubert Figuiere
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Paul Rohr
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Hubert Figuiere
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Paul Rohr
- More on imaging (was Re: gdk-pixbu... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: More on imaging Paul Rohr
- Re: More on imaging Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: More on imaging Paul Rohr
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Dom Lachowicz
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Paul Rohr
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Leonard Rosenthol
