>2.  Use system-specific services, such as the BeOS and QNX image munging
>APIs.  In this case, the XP API would be implemented by platform-specific
>code to call those system services.  This is what Thomas Fletcher has been
>advocating, for obvious (and good) reasons.

>5.  Use gdk-pixbuf instead.
>
>I'm not clear on what *you* mean by #5.  Some folks seem to believe that
>something like gdk-pixbuf could be ported to become a lighter-weight
>solution than miniIM for all our platforms.  If I read Dom correctly, he's
>been proposing to only use gdk-pixbuf on GTK/GNOME.
>
>For you, is #5 more like #4 or more like #2?

I've been arguing for #5 to be a specific implementation of #2 - gdk-pixbuf 
is the system service.

Dom

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Reply via email to