>>>>> "rms" == rms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: rms> The problem of releasing a 1.0 without common and reasonable to rms> expect features relies on the users that will feel that AbiWord rms> is crap because it doesn't have a feature that almost every other rms> word processor has. These users will unlikely come bac to abiword rms> soon, and will express their contempt to others. That's an argument for integer release numbers, my friend. Every release will be judged on its merrits, not its version number and what people expect from that string of numbers and dots... Thanks for making my arguments :) Jesper
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Ron Ross
- constraints and table models (was Re: To... Paul Rohr
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 rms
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Eric W. Sink
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tom Newton
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
