On 03 May 2001 13:57:47 +0200, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
>
> I seriously can think of a single "sort of stuff to compose documents"
> that can not deal with tables. And don't say me:
> "{kword,netscape,whatever} doesn't has tables support, they only have a
> bad hack." They have something that works. Period. In the user mind,
> rtf import/export will only be a very little detail compared to the lack
> of tables.
maybe I've not been very clear, here... rtf import/export *of tables*
is a little detail if compared to not having tables at all.
Cheers,
--
Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Eric W. Sink
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tom Newton
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 rms
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Paul Rohr
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tom Newton
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tom Newton
