Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try

[ha shao]

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:47:09PM +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, ha shao wrote:
.....
> > \kerning0\cf0\viewkind1\paperw12240\paperh15840\margl1440\margr1440\widowctl
> > \sectd\sbknone\colsx360\headery0\footery0
> > \pard{\f0 \'b3\'d4\'c1\'cb\'c2\'f0}}
> 
>  Is it correct RTF (seems so)?
> 

Yes, it is correct.

>  Andrew's RTF looks different from yours because Andrew is running Win2k - it
> seems XAP_EncodingManager.is_cjk_locale() returns 0 under Win2k and 1 (as
> expected) under unix. Andrew, coduld you correct this (make is_cjk_locale()
> returning proper value)?

If the \uxxxx output is correct (that other wp can load it with no
problem), maybe the is_cjk_locale is not needed? Sorry, I forget the
reason to have that in the place. We must have some reason...
Maybe for export to the 'rtf for old application' format?

-- 
Best regard
hashao