Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try

[ha shao]

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 06:19:38PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ha shao wrote:
> > If the \uxxxx output is correct (that other wp can load it with no
> > problem), maybe the is_cjk_locale is not needed? Sorry, I forget the
> > reason to have that in the place. We must have some reason...
> > Maybe for export to the 'rtf for old application' format?
> 
> Unicode aware RTF readers will be okay.  Older ones will not.
> In my opinion we should work as well as possible for new and
> old readers so I will look into this.
> 

I see. Then better leave it in the current form.

-- 
Best regard
hashao