> In C++ we have a standard library which contains a template data type > std::pair. That one contains two data members named "first" and "second". > I'm confident Sam didn't know about this when he put it in, but would anyone > mind if I fixed this once the DNS records are set straight again? (I can't > even get CVS now... :-( ). Should anyone get bored and want to fix it in the > meantime I won't complain. I don't like first and second. I think we should keep 'car' and 'cdr'. Irrational? Yes. So what? pat
- UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Sam TH
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Pierre Abbat
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Shaw Terwilliger
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr rms
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Diego Sueiro
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- RE: UT_Pair car and cdr Sean R. Bright
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- RE: UT_Pair car and cdr Sean R. Bright
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Aaron Lehmann
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr smith
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Dom Lachowicz
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Fw: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
