> In C++ we have a standard library which contains a template data type
> std::pair. That one contains two data members named "first" and "second".
> I'm confident Sam didn't know about this when he put it in, but would anyone
> mind if I fixed this once the DNS records are set straight again? (I can't
> even get CVS now... :-( ). Should anyone get bored and want to fix it in the
> meantime I won't complain.

I don't like first and second.  I think we should keep 'car' and
'cdr'.   Irrational?  Yes.  So what?

pat



Reply via email to