> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Nordell > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 7:55 PM > To: AbiWord-dev > Subject: Re: UT_Pair car and cdr > > > Patrick Lam wrote: > [Mike informing of the C++ way] ... > "car" and "cdr". These TLAs has absolutely no meaning in C++, > not to mention > the fact that they are *completely wrong* to use in a "pair". I beg to differ. A cons in Lisp is effectively a linked list node and therefore "car" points to the first element and "cdr" points to the second element. The fact that the second element in the node is a list is irrelevant. Just wanted to sound smart, carry on :) Sean
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Pierre Abbat
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Shaw Terwilliger
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr rms
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Diego Sueiro
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Sean R. Bright
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- RE: UT_Pair car and cdr Sean R. Bright
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Aaron Lehmann
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr smith
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Patrick Lam
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Dom Lachowicz
- Re: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
- Fw: UT_Pair car and cdr Mike Nordell
