Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
> gcc has builtin versions of a lot of the <string.h>
> functions, so doesn't demand headers for them.

Oh, isn't that a clear violation of the ISO standard (OK, ANSI is implied)?
Microsoft also has intrinsics (compiler - not runtime library - versions of
a few functions), but to use those without declaring the function is a clear
violation of the language standard AFAIK.

Has anyone here contact with the gcc team? If not, I'll try get the time to
report it to them.

/Mike


Reply via email to