Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> 
> Quoting Paul Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I'd like to address your concerns.
> 
> 1) Abi never had any string classes (nor anything even remotely resembling
> them). The closest thing that we had was either:
> a. UT_Bytebuf (ick)
> b. Our own management using malloc, free, new, delete, delete[], and all of the
> not-so-wonderful inconsistencies that came with them, not to mention keeping
> track of everything (size, pointers) and ownership of the strings, since to
> this point Abi had no clear ownership model for *any* of its pointers or
> references, save the singleton classes

Actually, I find UT_Bytebuf useful for strings.  I use them in the text
importer and exporter so I can have one set of functions regardless of
whether I'm handling 8-bit or 16-bit text.  And it'll work if and when
we have to handle 32-bit text.

> So now we have a nice wrapper class for C strings and UCS2 strings, which is
> nice on the eyes, easier on the programmers, and probably more effecient both
> in terms of time and space. They support a lot of nice, clean operations,
> manage memory for us effectively, etc... We no longer have strcat's in our
> code. This is a good thing.

This must have been discussed at some point, but I'll bring it up since
I've not seen it here yet.  I read all of the Unicode mailing lists
and newsgroups I can and it seems everybody *hates* UCS-2.  Except
maybe Microsoft (:  The rest of the world are coming to grips with
using UTF-8 for interchange, and UTF-32 (UCS-4) internally.  If you
know anything about surrogates you'll understand why.  Many people
believe that using UCS-2, a character can always fit into one UCS-2
char.  Some believe that if they pretend surrogates don't exist
they can keeping using UCS-2.  But this is not true.  Many characters
take more than one codepoint even in UTF-32.  The major concern with
UTF-32 is that it doubles the amount of memory needed over UCS-2 ):

What's our position?  We're going to have to look into it sooner or
later and it won't be fun.

Sorry if this has all been thrashed out before.

Andrew Dunbar.

-- 
http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Reply via email to