On 19 Jun 2001 21:50:19 -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:55:05PM -0400, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> > Regardless of their apparent usefulness, UT_Bytebufs are not strings. They
> > don't look or behave like strings - they represent a block of memory and
> > nothing more.
>
> What makes a string any more than a block of memory, except OO
> masochism (Object Obfuscation)?
one more time, you're confusing internal representation of a string with
a string.
Can you explain what makes a button any more than a bunch of pixels in
screen?
Fair questions about the need of a class are ok, but all your questions
about the need of a string class have already been replied. If you're
not able to understand the reply, say it and I (or somebody else) can
try to explain it better, but your mail seems to me more like a troll
than a fair question.
Cheers,
--
Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
