At 09:46 AM 8/18/01 +0100, Andrew Dunbar wrote: >Has anybody considered >comparing our behaviour to that of MSWord? Its >interface seems to be MDI built with SDI style windows >and is not far off our interface other than closing >the last window leaves Word open with no document. Andrew, I'm familiar with earlier (true MDI) versions of Word, but it sounds like you're talking about something different. Could you give a more detailed description (or screenshots or ASCII art) of what this UI looks like in the following three cases? - two documents open - one document open - zero documents open Of course, I'm particularly interested in the third case. ;-) Paul, who still thinks following Web browser precedent is a Good Thing
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... James Montgomerie
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... David Chart
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... H�kan Waara
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers ... Phil Stracchino
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers ... Paul Rohr
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... David Chart
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... Paul Rohr
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... Paul Rohr
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... Tim LaDuca
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... Paul Rohr
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... H�kan Waara
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... Tim LaDuca
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... Tim LaDuca
- Re: FAQ -- why the MSDI interface? (aka, no pagers pleas... JAL
