On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 09:26:26AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> No major problem, but I'm a little confused about our release
> procedures. Do we test before or after your tagged release?
>
> If before, when do we see a "release candidate", and in either case,
> shouldn't the release candidate be named something different than the
> actual release?
Good question; actually, I've had the same question myself. It seems
that we have just been tagging the official release and _then_ going
ahead with testing, which seems convoluted to me.
Can we tag a prerelease to kill bugs/make sure the kinks are all ironed
out?
Take care,
John
--
May God have mercy on us all.
- abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Martin Sevior
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Hubert Figuiere
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Alan Keefer
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. scott
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Randy Kramer
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time n... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. John L. Clark
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Martin Sevior
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time n... John L. Clark
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Alan
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela
- Re: abiword 0.9.4 Tuesday - Melbourne time next. Randy Kramer
