On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:30:44PM +0000, Andrew Dunbar wrote: > --- alper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is anybody taking care of these? Any problem? > > They've been checked in but I noticed the .strings > file was not checked in. > I also noticed that all the files seem to be in CP1254 > encoding but declare > themselves to be ISO-8859-1.
How did you notice that? What tells it so? > I'm trying to test them but not having much luck on my > system. Have you > been able to test them? On what system? yes, tested quite thoroughly, platform is Win2K-English having ISO-8859-1 & 9 support (and a bunch of code conversion tables), with Cygwin 1.3.6-4 & its tools. No problem. > I have Turkish-capable fonts and Mozilla renders > Turkish correctly. I can > also run AbiWord as eg, Cyrillic. And I have Netscape 6.2, it renders .strings files correctly and changes encoding per se. In fact, multilingual capabilities of W2K is a bit mystery to me. Lastly, I used vi through Cygwin Bash shell to edit .strings, and it also renders OK (but I can't tell this is _really_ a text mode app in W2K ;)) Regards, --alper
