On Sat, 2001-12-15 at 16:23, Piotr Banski wrote: > It seems to me that the combination of CLOSED and LATER (or > REMIND, for that matter) stretches the semantics of CLOSED too far.
FWIW I agree. But as far as I can tell, it's how Mozilla people handle their bugs. And unfortunately making different states than what comes as default is a pain. Hopefully it's something that will change in Bugzilla 3, but that's a project far far into the future. I think we'd probably be better of setting the milestone of such bugs to 'future' and tell developers to set their default search to only include bugs with milestones: ---, 1.0, and 1.2. That way, bugs we are not planning to fix in the near term do not clutter the search results - which is, I believe, the reason for CLOSE/LATER'ing such bugs. Jesper
