According to Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > sorry to nitpick but maybe a three letter extension might be better? (i > dunno, maybe .bza). Its probably not inherently any better but i still > try and keep to 8.3 filenames out of habit.
No. This is urban legend, that even Microsoft continue to believes in that extension is to be limited to 3 chars (see the .htm story). > (I assume the more descriptive option to name files .abw.bz2 is still also > available) I'm against that double extension given how they are handled is Win... See the latest Outlook viruses like the "I LOVE YOU" to understand how that does work.... Hub
