Paul Rohr wrote: > Discovering bad bugs at step 3 is a clear indicator that the release was > *not*, in fact, ready for prime time.
Indeed. Would it be feasible to create a "test" release before major releases? It would obviously be a greater burden for all, and it would probably create "test2" and so on releases, but it would probably iron out the "obvious" bugs. Since I really don't know how much effort goes into a full release-cycle it's possible this idea is in reality not possible. /Mike - please don't cc
