> This, of course, needs a definition of showstopper.
> Suggestions:
> 
> a) Doesn't build dist. Obviously.
> b) Crash on core function. Opening a standard .abw
> document, for
> example. We'd need a list of these in the test
> suite.
> c) Dataloss on core function. The bug in, er, 0.99.2
> or so which
> resulted in all style information being lost on save
> would be an
> example.

These are all legitmate definitions of showstoppers.
I would add a fourth one:

d) Significant loss of functionality.  Examples of
this would be:

* A last-minute change breaking the ability to export
PSION documents

* Multi-level undo being broken (this happened)

* The strings file for a given language becoming
unparsable (this also happened)

In cases like this, I think it would be fair to revert
the code (or strings file) in question if the
maintainer of the offending code was not around to fix
things properly.

- Sam



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
La emoci�n e intensidad del deporte en Yahoo! Deportes. http://deportes.yahoo.com.mx

Reply via email to