Hello, > This is just wrong. I tried to discuss what was > needed > in an open way when Barbarism support first came up. > We don't need a knee-jerk fix for a single problem. > We need something flexible that'll be able to be re- > used in intelligent ways. Surely! > Grammar errors are just errors too yet they get a > different colour. I tried to warn that even though > to you in your language you consider it spelling, that > others in other languages or other areas fixable by > the exact same new feature would look at it > differently > - this is why I advocated generic squiggle code with > colours etc settable by the caller. > (Sorry that was a rant - I'm in a volative mood)
That's wrong in your opinion, that is very respectable. I do not want to enter in a discussion that I already had. If you have a better way of doing it, please give a specific proposal and I have no problem enhancing that is already been done. > We are? Where can I read about it? Don't have IRC > ability right now if that's where it was discussed. We talk about IRC about a few weeks ago. Dom was going to do the work. Thanks Andrew, -- Jordi Mas http://www.softcatala.org
