On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 23:40, Daniel Jensen wrote: > BTW, for QA, what's the policy on verifying bugs which are verifiably > fixed in head but not in stable? Should such bugs get verified as fixed > unless the bug is slated for fixing in stable (is on the "make 1.0.5 not > suck" list)?
Change the version field of the bugzilla entry to indicate STABLE cvs branch, and make a note that the fix needs to be backported (as a comment). Keep the bug open. Hub- Perhaps a needbackport keyword to help keep track of these, not only in this but future stable branches? -MG
