Mark Gilbert wrote:
BTW, for QA, what's the policy on verifying bugs which are verifiably fixed in head but not in stable? Should such bugs get verified as fixed unless the bug is slated for fixing in stable (is on the "make 1.0.5 not suck" list)?
Change the version field of the bugzilla entry to indicate STABLE cvs
branch, and make a note that the fix needs to be backported (as a
comment).  Keep the bug open.
I wasn't clear enough, sorry- I mean bugs which are in the RESOLVED state which I am wondering whether to verify. Should these really be reopened?
--
Support varied threatened habitats throughout the world:
http://www.ecologyfund.com/




Reply via email to