On Friday 24 August 2001 04:52 pm, Gregory L Harris wrote:
> I've read this thread with a good deal of interest, and have been reluctant
> to comment, especially if there's is little chance of affecting the
> outcome. But I think this particular design point could be a larger
> impediment to adoption than some may realize.
Why not make it configurable, so that the user of the program can decide how
it behaves when it exits? This would give the program excellent
configurability.
-----------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
unsubscribe in the message body.
