Right, the bug seems to have been introduced in 4.6.2, at least the Debian/Linaro/Ubuntu one.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/16/2011 02:49 PM, Jani Monoses wrote: >> Marc, >> your observation of toolchain changing was spot on. >> >> I built the latest 3.0 for armel and armhf (so those with precise >> armhf can test too) using gcc 4.5 >> >> http://startx.ro/~jani/ >> >> Others please test :) >> >> And it boots fine. >> Rebuilt same tree with 4.6 and locks up with Toshiba logo. >> >> I am not sure if it is an unrelated toolchain issue, or only triggered >> along with the RAM timing change, but I suspect >> it is toolchain only. I rebuilt a 2.6.38 too with the 4.6 toolchain >> and it did not boot. > > FYI, all the kernels I build are with a home-grown gcc-4.6.1 (built > using crosstool-ng, and a virgin 4.6.1 release without patches), so > there's nothing intrinsically wrong with gcc-4.6 itself. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
