I'd be happy to participate in some testing - in fact I was going to propose 
another ConfXP test to the bigvideo group soon - maybe for next thursday?

Chris Moffatt wrote:

   Hi Derek,

   I am the program manager for ConferenceXP at Microsoft Research.

   Unfortunately the interop story remains the same, and we don't have any
   bridging capability at the moment.

   Regarding audio/video - you are correct that you can't logically tie a/v
   devices across multiple machines, and I'd like to better understand the
   scenario that this serves? We can however support multiple cameras per
   computer.

   You comments regarding venue service configuration are valid and I will
   add this to our wish list for the next release.

   I would certainly be interested in participating in some testing with
   anyone who is keen. I think Bob Riddle would be as well - right Bob :-)

   Regards
   Chris


   -----Original Message-----
   From: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov> 
[mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov] On
   Behalf Of Derek Piper
   Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:49 AM
   To: Douglas Kosovic
   Cc: Wan Sin NG; ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov>
   Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Conference XP vs AG


        Is that still the story on interoperability? Those posts you
   linked to
   are years old. Is there a VRVS style bridging thing somewhere?. Sorry to

   resurect an old thread, I'm getting back into reading the list after
   vacation.
        I've taken a look at Conference XP and it's very slick to
   operate, just
   run it and go like Bob said. Also does shared applications, including a
   'screen streamer' too. The only thing slightly unweidly is the venue
   stuff, you have to add a venue server to a list of entries and then
   select it to go to it, as far as I can see there's not the 'url bar'
   style that AccessGrid has, there are also many less venues, as far as I
   can tell.
        Audio and Video seems limited to the client machine, i.e. you
   can't
   have multiple machines running cameras and audio and tie them together
   like AG does, and of course it's Windows only.
        Running a Venue server is simple enough, and like I mentioned
   you have
   to add the url to a drop-down list and then select it to access that
   server's venues.
        I'd enjoy doing some distance/conference tests if anyone else
   wants to
   play with it too. It'd be interesting to see how it handles many
   participants. If anyone wants to play with it, email me off-list and let

   me know.

        Derek

   Douglas Kosovic wrote:


      Hi Wansin,



         Can ConferenceXP and AGTk interop?



      See:



   http://www.conferencexp.net/community/messageboard/Thread.aspx?tabindex=
   12&id=71





   http://www.conferencexp.net/Community/messageboard/Thread.aspx?tabindex=
   12&id=149




      Doug








--
Bob Riddle (b...@internet2.edu<mailto:b...@internet2.edu>)    
Technologist,Internet2
1000 Oakbrook, Suite 300          Ann Arbor, Michigan  48108
Business Phone: 734.913.4257      Fax Number:  734.913.4255

"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very 
narrow field."  Niels Bohr

Reply via email to