It resembles the AG, where all the nodews "join" a specific multicast group.  
There are Venue Servers that, as the AG venue server also does, tells the 
client which multicast group is associated with the selected Venue.


John Langkals wrote:

   AG Tech, Bob, and Cindy,

   How does Conference XP initiate, maintain, and teardown the connection
   between sites/nodes?  Is it a SIP/H.323 ITU like IP dialing protocol or does
   it resemble the AccessGrid/VRVS virtual venue HTTPS certificate server
   model.

   Thank you,

   John

   John Langkals
   Systems Manager
   OCTS
   M2021 Physics Research Building
   191 West Woodruff Avenue
   Columbus, Ohio 43210
   614.292.6957 Office
   614.327.3732 Cell
   614.292.7557 FAX
   www.octs.osu.edu<http://www.octs.osu.edu>

   -----Original Message-----
   From: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov> 
[mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf
   Of Bob Riddle
   Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 1:14 PM
   To: Cindy Sievers
   Cc: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov>
   Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Conference XP vs AG

   Here are my observations (overlooking the Windows-only thing):

   1. ConfXP is more "user-friendly" - you don't need a node operator, unix
   expert, a magic wand, or need to wave a dead chicken & chant to make it
   work.

   2. The video is much better - ConfXP takes advantage of the Windows Media
   API's and does a very nice job rendering the video & audio - lipsynch has
   not been a problem for me in my test sessions with folks in Europe.

   3. A "bridge" is provided for multicast-challenged users and to use it, the
   user simply uses a pull-down menu item on their ConfXP.

   4. the integration of the client with the TabletPC is compelling (at least
   to me).  It allows the instructor/presenter to face the "audience"
   instead of pointing at a screen and allows interactive mark-ups on the
   presentation.

   5. you can specify point-to-point connections for two sites, and it seems to
   work well for the bandwidth challenged locations.

   Thats my $.02

   Cindy Sievers wrote:



      Hi everyone,

      I was just wondering if anyone has had a chance to test Microsoft
      Conference XP?  What are the major  differences between AG and
      Conference XP? (aside from the fact that Conference XP only runs on a
      windows macine) I was looking at their documentation, and they use the
      exact terminology that AG does, almost the same equipment list, and
      seem to have the same results.....but I just wanted to hear from folks
      who have actually used it....
      We are going to do a collaborative education project with a remote
      site who is leaning toward Conference XP and they want to know what
      the differences are and what the compelling arguments are for either....

      Thanks
      Cindy



      ============================================
      Cindy Sievers           Los Alamos National Laboratory
      siev...@lanl.gov<mailto:siev...@lanl.gov>        Group CCS-1 MS B287
      tel:505.665.6602        Advanced Computing
      fax:505.665.4939        Los Alamos, NM 87544
      ============================================








--
Bob Riddle (b...@internet2.edu<mailto:b...@internet2.edu>)    
Technologist,Internet2
1000 Oakbrook, Suite 300          Ann Arbor, Michigan  48108
Business Phone: 734.913.4257      Fax Number:  734.913.4255

"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very 
narrow field."  Niels Bohr

Reply via email to