heh. it's password protected now. --fred
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:45PM, ULM AccessGrid said: > Sorry All, > > Should be fixed now. I was hoping to have it fixed before someone noticed > :-) It seems Zone Alarm 5.0 and XP's IIS don't get along together. The > problem has been corrected now. > > Adam > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Dech [mailto:fd...@uchicago.edu] > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:19 PM > To: ULM AccessGrid > Cc: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov > Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] VideoProducerService is also receiving??? > > hi Adam. > > double-check that archive: > http://198.232.231.51/packages/AccessGrid-2.2-UNSTABLE-.fc2.tar.gz > i downloaded it and took a look at it: > ..... > sucag1[root]43# tar tvzf AccessGrid-2.2-UNSTABLE-.fc2.tar.gz > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2004-07-08 16:14:11 AccessGrid-2.2/ > -rwxr-xr-x root/root 134 2004-07-08 16:14:11 AccessGrid-2.2/install > -rw------- root/root 1129130 2004-07-08 16:13:59 > AccessGrid-2.2/xawtv-3.88-6.i386.rpm > > gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file > tar: Unexpected EOF in archive > tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now > .... > i downloaded it again, thinking it was a transfer glitch, but got the same > file again. > > --fred > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:11AM, ULM AccessGrid said: > > > > UPDATE: > > > > I found a quick way to make the VICs on my video machine transmit(sort of) > > only. I just added a firewall line that blocked all incoming sources that > > were not on my subnet. I now have three VICs with only one video per VIC > on > > my video box. Thanks Michael for letting me know it was not just me. You > > helped me think of this solution. FINALLY AG2.2 is running well on my > > multi-os node. > > > > I am in the process of making a comprehensive HOW-TO to install AG2.2 on > > Fedora2. It should be finished within the hour. It will come with links > to > > all files needed for the install. > > > > Here's the link: > > > > http://198.232.231.51/install.txt > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > Thanks > > > > Adam Taylor > > Computing Center > > University of Louisiana at Monroe > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov] On > Behalf > > Of Michael Miller > > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:14 AM > > To: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov > > Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] VideoProducerService is also receiving??? > > > > Adam, > > > > I've seen this question a couple times. Yes, this is normal behavior in > my > > experience. You should notice though that all the streams in the > > VideoProducer VICs muted. I believe this eliminates the bandwith usage > > that those streams would need, but there still maybe a small amount in > > order for VIC to know that the stream is still there. I'll let the vic > > experts chime in here... > > > > It would make more sense if a single instance of VIC could be configured > to > > handle multiple inputs/transmits but I'll bet there would be a whole lot > of > > changes to the code necessary to handle that. > > > > hope this helps > > > > Michael Miller > > NCSA > > > > At 06:31 PM 7/8/2004, Adam Taylor wrote: > > > > >I have a weird problem. When I add my three VideoProducerServices they > > >add without a problem. When I join the venue the weirdness begins. My > > >three VIC s on my Fedora2(Video Capture) box comes up with my three > > >cameras (one camera for each instance of VIC). The problem is that all > > >three VICs receive ALL the other video streams in the venue also. I have > > > >three duplicate pairs of the incoming video streams. However there is > > >only one instance of each of my cameras (One camera on each VIC like it > is > > >suppose to). Can anyone tell me why my three VideoProducerServices VICs > > >are also receiving Video too??? > > > > > > > > > > > >When I join a venue without anybody I get three VICs with one camera on > > >each like there are suppose to do. If someone joins the venue, those > > >three instances of VIC each receive all of the other persons video > > >streams too. > > > > > > > > > > > >I m sorry if I double stated it but I just wanted to make sure I was as > > >clear as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > >Adam Taylor > > > > > >Computing Center > > > > > >University of Louisiana at Monroe. > > > > Thanx, > > > > Michael Miller > > System Engineer > > Visualization Technology Support > > Computing and Data Management > > National Center for Supercomputing Applications > > University of Illinois - UC > > 217-649-0747 > > > > "If you're clear in your vision and trust the people in your team with > > clear objectives, they will invariably do their best to achieve everything > > > desired, and usually deliver everything you could have hoped for and even > > more." -Paul Debevec
