On 18/05/2010 11:52 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote: > Aaron suggestion was like [*plain*plain**)[bold*bold*), which I come here > with. This is the most complicated and potentially confusing, but also the least expensive for out-of-process clients. Have you had any feedback from the Orca devs on this?
> Your suggestion was [*)[plain)[*)[plain)[**)[bold)[*)[bold)[*). I like this solution most in that it is still quite logical without incurring the unnecessary overhead of having separate ranges for every embedded object character. > My last suggestion (based on your suggestion) was > [*)[plain)[*)[plain)[*)[*)[bold)[*)[bold)[*). > [This] suggestion is quicker supposedly if > we don't think about method call cost I assume you mean quicker on the app side? I don't think it would ever be quicker on the AT side. Jamie -- James Teh Vice President NV Access Inc, ABN 61773362390 Email: [email protected] Web site: http://www.nvaccess.org/ _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
