Ok, thanks James. I'll come with Rob's approach, then I will send try Firefox build to Orca developers to check if performance is good enough.
Alex. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:09 PM, James Teh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/05/2010 11:52 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote: >> Aaron suggestion was like [*plain*plain**)[bold*bold*), which I come here >> with. > This is the most complicated and potentially confusing, but also the > least expensive for out-of-process clients. Have you had any feedback > from the Orca devs on this? > >> Your suggestion was [*)[plain)[*)[plain)[**)[bold)[*)[bold)[*). > I like this solution most in that it is still quite logical without > incurring the unnecessary overhead of having separate ranges for every > embedded object character. > >> My last suggestion (based on your suggestion) was >> [*)[plain)[*)[plain)[*)[*)[bold)[*)[bold)[*). >> [This] suggestion is quicker supposedly if >> we don't think about method call cost > I assume you mean quicker on the app side? I don't think it would ever > be quicker on the AT side. > > Jamie > > -- > James Teh > Vice President > NV Access Inc, ABN 61773362390 > Email: [email protected] > Web site: http://www.nvaccess.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Accessibility-ia2 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2 > _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
