I disagree with the first sentence after the intro: "All objects must, at a minimum, provide the IAccessible, IAccessible2, and IServiceProvider interfaces."
Can we please change it to something like: "In order to provide enhanced accessibility using the IAccessible2 set of interfaces, an object must, at a minimum, provide the IAccessible, IAccessible2, and IServiceProvider interfaces." Objects have a choice - they can just let the MSAA[UIA] proxy do the work (which is often all they need), or they can provide some extra IAccessible stuff, or, if they want enhanced accessibility, they can provide UIA - or IA2. Technically, if an object wanted to be everybody's friend, it could provide MSAA+IA2+UIA. :) Note also that in Eclipse, relation objects provide *only* IAccessibleRelation. But I don't think that negates your statement, because relation objects aren't really "accessible objects" - they're just little "implementation detail" objects <g>. This IA2 Implementation Guide doesn't discuss Relations at all - it there a follow-on document that will? Car From: Pete Brunet <[email protected]> To: IA2 List <[email protected]> Date: 02/06/2010 05:26 PM Subject: [Accessibility-ia2] IA2 Implementation Guide ready for review Sent by: [email protected] Please review the IA2 Implementation Guide and provide your feedback. http://a11y.org/ia2-implementation -- Pete Brunet a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development (512) 238-6967 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell) Skype: pete.brunet IM: ptbrunet (AOL, Google), [email protected] (MSN) http://www.a11ysoft.com/about/ Ionosphere: WS4G _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
_______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
