Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group
[email protected] wrote on 11/18/2010
04:29:54 PM:
> From: James Teh <[email protected]>
> To: IAccessible2 mailing list
<[email protected]>
> Date: 11/18/2010 04:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Accessibility-ia2] IA2_STATE_PINNED
> Sent by: [email protected]
>
> On 19/11/2010 8:18 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> > For a state you have to run the IDL again. I am not arguing that we
> > should not provide a provision for pinned but I would like to avoid the
> > churn.
> Makes sense. I'd be happy to support it as an object attribute if it is
> endorsed by the IA2 spec. That said, it sets a precedent we may not want
> to set; i.e. that all new states will become object attributes. Among
> other things, this adds to the many object attributes that already
> exist, and since there's no way yet to retrieve specific object
> attributes, this is going to get very nasty sooner or later.
>
I understand. I also would like it to be endorsed by the IA2 spec too. All
these attributes need to be documented.
> Jamie
>
> --
> James Teh
> Vice President
> NV Access Inc, ABN 61773362390
> Email: [email protected]
> Web site: http://www.nvaccess.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
