Hi Jamie, The latest post is actually a little later on July 26 and can be seen at: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/accessibility-ia2/2011-July/001515.html You agreed with this 5 days later at: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/accessibility-ia2/2011-July/001515.html
I'm open to discussion of whether or not to use an object attribute though. Pete On 7/24/12 12:14 AM, James Teh wrote: > Hi all, > > Unless I'm missing something, the last message I can find about the > explicit name proposal is here: > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/accessibility-ia2/2011-July/001509.html > > I explained there why I prefer the approach of using a flag rather > than having a separate name property. > > If others agree with the flag, is there any reason this shouldn't just > be done using an object attribute, rather than introducing another > method? With the new object attribute retrieval method, this will be > just as efficient. > > The other benefit to this is that it also allows us to start using it > right away. This is definitely something that is needed. > > Thanks, > Jamie > -- *Pete Brunet* a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development (512) 467-4706 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell) Skype: pete.brunet IM: ptbrunet (AOL, Google), [email protected] (MSN) http://www.a11ysoft.com/about/ Ionosphere: WS4G
_______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
