> I don't think this is correct. As I understand it, aria-atomic requires that > the region be reported as a whole for any change within the subtree, no > matter how small. Also, notifications still depend on aria-relevant.
Ok, got it. > True when this live region (i.e. this object and its subtree) should be > presented as a whole when relevant changes occur within it. sounds ok. Thank you. Alex. On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:21 AM, James Teh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/08/2012 11:45 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: >>> >>> How's this: True when this object and its subtree should be presented as >>> a >>> whole, when changes within it are considered important enough to be >>> presented automatically. >> >> maybe: True when the fractional changes in the object subtree should >> be collected and presented as a whole. >> at least this sounds closer to my understanding of aria atomic :) > > I don't think this is correct. As I understand it, aria-atomic requires that > the region be reported as a whole for any change within the subtree, no > matter how small. Also, notifications still depend on aria-relevant. > > Perhaps this text might work: > True when this live region (i.e. this object and its subtree) should be > presented as a whole when relevant changes occur within it. > > > Jamie > > -- > James Teh > Director, NV Access Limited > Email: [email protected] > Web site: http://www.nvaccess.org/ > Phone: +61 7 5667 8372 > _______________________________________________ > Accessibility-ia2 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2 _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
