This is utterly insensitive. What would a blind do without her/his
stick? Cane is her lifeline. Do we have similar experiences in India
too?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/12000482/Blind-girl-seven-banned-from-using-white-stick-at-school-as-it-is-health-and-safety-risk.html


A blind girl has been banned from bringing her white walking stick to
school because of "health and safety" reasons.


Lily-Grace Hooper, seven, suffered a stroke when she was just four
days old, leaving her with virtually no sight.


But her school, Hambrook Primary School in Bristol, has told the
youngster she can no longer use her cane because it could trip up
teachers and other pupils.


A risk assessment completed on behalf of the school said the cane
caused high risk to other people and that Lily-Grace should instead
have "100 per cent" adult support at all times.


However, her mother is worried her daughter will become too dependent
on having someone show her around - and said having a helper would set
her daughter apart from other pupils.







"She hasn't had any problems with any of the other students, and none
of the parents have complained about it - in fact, they have all been
very supportive"

Kristy Hooper








Lily-Grace suffered a stroke days after she was born. As a result, she
lost her 3D vision and became blind in her right eye. She can now only
see lights and colours in her left.

Shortly before Christmas last year, she started using long wrapping
paper rolls to help her get around the house.

She asked her mother for a stick and was given a long fibre-glass
walking cane by Common Sense Cane, a charity for blind children
earlier this year.

Lily-Grace started using the cane in school in April. Her mother,
Kristy Hooper, said it had become "an extension of her daughter's arm"
and that it was vital she was allowed to use it.

She added: "It is a disability, but I want to celebrate it and make
sure she can become independent. When the school told me she can no
longer bring her cane into school, I just thought this must be health
and safety gone mad.

"She hasn't had any problems with any of the other students, and none
of the parents have complained about it - in fact, they have all been
very supportive.

"I don't understand where the school is coming from. Lily-Grace has
taken to the cane very quickly, and she needs it as she travels to
school, walks to the playground, or just being in school."



Ms Hooper said: "I am absolutely livid. What about the health and
safety of my girl? I like the school, they are a good school, but this
really is very poor advice.

"It's just ridiculous. If you took a walking cane away from a blind
adult, you would say that was discrimination. It's the same here."

Sarah Murray, founder of Common Sense Canes, said: "I'm very
supportive of Kristy, and what she's facing is absolute nonsense from
the school. A child needs to learn to be independent, and they need to
start from a very young age.

"I've heard about this health and safety reasons, and I just cannot
fathom what the school is thinking. Why are they taking a cane away
from a little girl?"

She added the cane supplied to Lily-Grace was longer than usual to
help her get about and also lighter than normal so it was suitable for
a child.

Lily-Grace Hooper
Lily-Grace Hooper   Photo: David Hedges/SWNS Group

Blind Children UK, the leading charity for vision-impaired children,
said it was imperative a child learned independence from a young age.

A spokesman said: "Using a cane teaches a child to keep themselves
safe and can help them to become less reliant on others. Early
intervention is vital to help a child with sight loss move around more
confidently and grow towards greater independence as an adult.

"While a cane may not be suitable for every child or young person with
sight loss, if they are taught how to use it by a trained habilitation
specialist, then, in general, there shouldn't be an issue with using
one safely around school."

The risk assessment said Lily-Grace should have full adult support at
all times and that she should use hand rails to navigate the school.

She also has been asked to "walk carefully over all surfaces"
especially paving stones and wet drain covers - but without the use of
her current cane.






"We are very keen to resolve this issue as soon as possible and have
been actively seeking to engage with the parent to bring this to an
agreeable conclusion"

head teacher Jo Dent

Instead, the risk assessment said she should use a shortened cane -
something her parents said is not suitable because she had become used
to her current cane.

Hambrook Primary School head teacher Jo Dent said: "The school's
mobility officer raised health and safety issues around the new cane
following a recent risk assessment.

"We have to consider all of our pupils, so it is important that we
have an opportunity to discuss the situation before we make any
decisions.

"We are very keen to resolve this issue as soon as possible and have
been actively seeking to engage with the parent to bring this to an
agreeable conclusion.

"The pupil has not been banned from bringing in their cane, we have
simply asked them to not use it around school as a temporary measure
until we have the chance to meet with the parent and discuss the
situation. It was initially hoped that we would have this resolved
within a day or two."


-- 
Avinash Shahi
Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU



Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to