Hi all.

As you know, the MIB has issued the OTT accessibility guidelines today.
Unfortunately, however, these guidelines are a real setback for the
disability
rights movement. They have been significantly diluted compared to the draft
version circulated in October 2025 and are almost entirely toothless. I have
therefore made a draft communication for you to send to the Ministry of
Information and Broadcasting to express your anguish and displeasure with
the guidelines,
should you agree with me.  I am sharing the email IDs of the concerned
officials along with a draft communication below. Please reply to this
message once
you have done so. Let us send out at least 50 representations.


email IDs:
  Send Mail Link [email protected],
Send Mail Link [email protected],
Send Mail Link [email protected],
Send Mail Link [email protected],
Send Mail Link [email protected],
Send Mail Link [email protected]

communication draft:





To
The Secretary
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
Government of India

*Subject:* Representation regarding implementation timelines under the
*Guidelines
for Accessibility of Content on platforms of publishers of Online Curated
Content (OTT Platforms) for Persons with Hearing and Visual Impairment*



Respected Sir,

I am a person with a *visual / hearing [insert as applicable] disability*.

At the outset, I wish to place on record my appreciation for the Ministry’s
initiative in issuing the *Guidelines for Accessibility of Content on
platforms of publishers of Online Curated Content (OTT Platforms) for
Persons with Hearing and Visual Impairment*, notified vide Office
Memorandum dated 06.02.2026. The formulation of accessibility standards for
OTT platforms is a long-awaited and important step towards ensuring equal
access to digital entertainment and cultural content for persons with
disabilities.

However, I wish to respectfully point out a serious concern with respect to
the *implementation framework* under the final notified guidelines, which,
in their present form, has rendered compliance substantially toothless*,
diluted and discretionary*.

In this regard, it is submitted that *Clause 4 of the draft guidelines
(dated 07.10.2025)* contemplated a *robust and time-bound implementation
schedule*, including:

   - Mandatory compliance for *new content* within *six months* of
   notification;
   - A *progressive but mandatory roadmap for existing content libraries*,
   requiring:
      - at least 30% accessibility within 12 months,
      - 60% within 18 months, and
      - *100% of the content library within 24 months*; and
   - A clear obligation to submit *quarterly progress reports* to enable
   monitoring and enforcement from the date of the guidelines being issued.

In stark contrast, *Clause 4 of the final notified guidelines (dated
06.02.2026)* provides that:

   - Publishers shall comply with accessibility requirements for *newly
   published content* *only upon expiry of thirty-six (36) months* from the
   date of publication of the guidelines, and that too *in a phased manner
   [a term which has not been defined anywhere in the guidelines]; and*
   - With respect to *existing content libraries*, publishers are merely
   *“encouraged”* to provide accessibility features on a *“best effort
   basis”*, with no mandatory timelines, milestones or enforceable
   obligations.

The net effect of this shift is that:

   - Persons with disabilities have *no enforceable right to accessible OTT
   content for at least three years* even for new releases; and
   - Accessibility of vast existing content libraries—constituting the
   overwhelming bulk of OTT content—has been rendered *entirely
   discretionary*.

This approach is inconsistent with *Section 46 of the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities Act, 2016*, which mandates that all service providers
shall comply with notified accessibility standards *within a period not
exceeding two years* from the date on which the accessibility standards are
notified. The statutory framework does not contemplate indefinite
postponement or optional compliance, particularly in sectors that directly
implicate equality, dignity, and participation in cultural life.

It is also pertinent to note that these guidelines have been issued *almost
a decade after the enactment of the RPwD Act*, and yet prescribe an
exceptionally lax implementation framework. Under Rule 15 of the RPwD
Rules, accessibility guidelines had to be issued by this Ministry by
December 2017, so we are already running 8+years too late. The cumulative
effect is that persons with disabilities continue to be excluded from OTT
platforms—now a primary mode of entertainment and information—long after
such exclusion was statutorily impermissible.

While industry stakeholders may have expressed feasibility concerns, such
concerns could not have justified a *complete dilution of mandatory
timelines*, particularly *without meaningful consultation with disability
groups on the issue of implementation and enforceability*. Accessibility is
not a matter of charity or convenience, but a statutory and constitutional
obligation flowing from Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and India’s
commitments under the UNCRPD.

In these circumstances, I most respectfully request the Ministry to *reconsider
and revisit the implementation provisions* of the final guidelines,
particularly with a view to:

   1. Aligning the compliance timelines with *Section 46 of the RPwD Act,
   2016*;
   2. Restoring a *mandatory, time-bound roadmap* for accessibility of
   existing content libraries; and
   3. Ensuring that phased implementation remains *meaningful, enforceable
   and subject to oversight*, rather than discretionary.

I remain hopeful that the Ministry will take corrective steps to ensure
that the promise of accessibility is realised in practice and not deferred
indefinitely.

Thanking you for your consideration.

Yours sincerely,

[Name]

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAL6V9AgFu7%2B%2Bkc2UxZgsH5oZgHkpy8u1ncYoAdPuAK86tnhYnA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to