Done.

On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 at 11:45, Shiva Kumar R C <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dun
>
> with regards  shivakumar r c. first division assistant department of
> treasury Government of Karnataka. mob/watsapp 9060720937
>
> On Mon, 9 Feb, 2026, 11:30 pm 'Rahul Bajaj' via AccessIndia, <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Hi all.
>>
>> As you know, the MIB has issued the OTT accessibility guidelines today.
>> Unfortunately, however, these guidelines are a real setback for the
>> disability
>> rights movement. They have been significantly diluted compared to the
>> draft version circulated in October 2025 and are almost entirely toothless.
>> I have
>> therefore made a draft communication for you to send to the Ministry of
>> Information and Broadcasting to express your anguish and displeasure with
>> the guidelines,
>> should you agree with me.  I am sharing the email IDs of the concerned
>> officials along with a draft communication below. Please reply to this
>> message once
>> you have done so. Let us send out at least 50 representations.
>>
>>
>> email IDs:
>>   Send Mail Link [email protected],
>> Send Mail Link [email protected],
>> Send Mail Link [email protected],
>> Send Mail Link [email protected],
>> Send Mail Link [email protected],
>> Send Mail Link [email protected]
>>
>> communication draft:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> To
>> The Secretary
>> Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
>> Government of India
>>
>> *Subject:* Representation regarding implementation timelines under the 
>> *Guidelines
>> for Accessibility of Content on platforms of publishers of Online Curated
>> Content (OTT Platforms) for Persons with Hearing and Visual Impairment*
>>
>>
>>
>> Respected Sir,
>>
>> I am a person with a *visual / hearing [insert as applicable] disability*
>> .
>>
>> At the outset, I wish to place on record my appreciation for the
>> Ministry’s initiative in issuing the *Guidelines for Accessibility of
>> Content on platforms of publishers of Online Curated Content (OTT
>> Platforms) for Persons with Hearing and Visual Impairment*, notified
>> vide Office Memorandum dated 06.02.2026. The formulation of accessibility
>> standards for OTT platforms is a long-awaited and important step towards
>> ensuring equal access to digital entertainment and cultural content for
>> persons with disabilities.
>>
>> However, I wish to respectfully point out a serious concern with respect
>> to the *implementation framework* under the final notified guidelines,
>> which, in their present form, has rendered compliance substantially
>> toothless*, diluted and discretionary*.
>>
>> In this regard, it is submitted that *Clause 4 of the draft guidelines
>> (dated 07.10.2025)* contemplated a *robust and time-bound implementation
>> schedule*, including:
>>
>>    - Mandatory compliance for *new content* within *six months* of
>>    notification;
>>    - A *progressive but mandatory roadmap for existing content libraries*,
>>    requiring:
>>       - at least 30% accessibility within 12 months,
>>       - 60% within 18 months, and
>>       - *100% of the content library within 24 months*; and
>>    - A clear obligation to submit *quarterly progress reports* to enable
>>    monitoring and enforcement from the date of the guidelines being issued.
>>
>> In stark contrast, *Clause 4 of the final notified guidelines (dated
>> 06.02.2026)* provides that:
>>
>>    - Publishers shall comply with accessibility requirements for *newly
>>    published content* *only upon expiry of thirty-six (36) months* from
>>    the date of publication of the guidelines, and that too *in a phased
>>    manner [a term which has not been defined anywhere in the guidelines]; 
>> and*
>>    - With respect to *existing content libraries*, publishers are merely
>>    *“encouraged”* to provide accessibility features on a *“best effort
>>    basis”*, with no mandatory timelines, milestones or enforceable
>>    obligations.
>>
>> The net effect of this shift is that:
>>
>>    - Persons with disabilities have *no enforceable right to accessible
>>    OTT content for at least three years* even for new releases; and
>>    - Accessibility of vast existing content libraries—constituting the
>>    overwhelming bulk of OTT content—has been rendered *entirely
>>    discretionary*.
>>
>> This approach is inconsistent with *Section 46 of the Rights of Persons
>> with Disabilities Act, 2016*, which mandates that all service providers
>> shall comply with notified accessibility standards *within a period not
>> exceeding two years* from the date on which the accessibility standards
>> are notified. The statutory framework does not contemplate indefinite
>> postponement or optional compliance, particularly in sectors that directly
>> implicate equality, dignity, and participation in cultural life.
>>
>> It is also pertinent to note that these guidelines have been issued *almost
>> a decade after the enactment of the RPwD Act*, and yet prescribe an
>> exceptionally lax implementation framework. Under Rule 15 of the RPwD
>> Rules, accessibility guidelines had to be issued by this Ministry by
>> December 2017, so we are already running 8+years too late. The cumulative
>> effect is that persons with disabilities continue to be excluded from OTT
>> platforms—now a primary mode of entertainment and information—long after
>> such exclusion was statutorily impermissible.
>>
>> While industry stakeholders may have expressed feasibility concerns, such
>> concerns could not have justified a *complete dilution of mandatory
>> timelines*, particularly *without meaningful consultation with
>> disability groups on the issue of implementation and enforceability*.
>> Accessibility is not a matter of charity or convenience, but a statutory
>> and constitutional obligation flowing from Articles 14 and 21 of the
>> Constitution and India’s commitments under the UNCRPD.
>>
>> In these circumstances, I most respectfully request the Ministry to 
>> *reconsider
>> and revisit the implementation provisions* of the final guidelines,
>> particularly with a view to:
>>
>>    1. Aligning the compliance timelines with *Section 46 of the RPwD
>>    Act, 2016*;
>>    2. Restoring a *mandatory, time-bound roadmap* for accessibility of
>>    existing content libraries; and
>>    3. Ensuring that phased implementation remains *meaningful,
>>    enforceable and subject to oversight*, rather than discretionary.
>>
>> I remain hopeful that the Ministry will take corrective steps to ensure
>> that the promise of accessibility is realised in practice and not deferred
>> indefinitely.
>>
>> Thanking you for your consideration.
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>>
>> [Name]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Disclaimer:
>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
>> the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>>
>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the
>> mails sent through this mailing list..
>>
>>
>> Search for old postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "AccessIndia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAL6V9AgFu7%2B%2Bkc2UxZgsH5oZgHkpy8u1ncYoAdPuAK86tnhYnA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAL6V9AgFu7%2B%2Bkc2UxZgsH5oZgHkpy8u1ncYoAdPuAK86tnhYnA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> Disclaimer:
> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
> the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>
> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
> sent through this mailing list..
>
>
> Search for old postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "AccessIndia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAAdLfM0ETbPvr01E8a-iToaW7rym0GrShFt%3DqHypakvVDxGwkA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAAdLfM0ETbPvr01E8a-iToaW7rym0GrShFt%3DqHypakvVDxGwkA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAB0hRFUYtgTWVGz%2BN-x_9TOCTdEzOZFUfHGeeohJ73xwmNexNw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to